Literatura

Zagłęb się w temat i zapoznaj się z oficjalnymi dokumentami, artykułami i zewnętrznymi publikacjami na temat stomatologii cyfrowej i jej rozwoju.

Broszury produktowe i ulotki

Publikacje zewnętrzne

Tytuł lub nazwa publikacji klinicznejAutor(zy)Rok publikacjiCzasopismoLink
Evaluating the impact of scan body angulation and geometric attachments on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impressions: A comparison of two intraoral scanners.Ra'fat I Farah, Bandar Alresheedi, Saad Alazmi, Sanaa N Al-Haj Ali.2023Journal of ProsthodonticsLink
Investigation of the Accuracy of Four Intraoral Scanners in Mandibular Full-Arch Digital Implant Impression: A Comparative In Vitro Study.Di Fiore A, Graiff L, Savio G, Granata S, Basilicata M, Bollero P, Meneghello R.2022Int J Environ Res Public HealthLink
In Vitro Comparison of Three Intraoral Scanners for Implant-Supported Dental Prostheses.Costa V, Silva AS, Costa R, Barreiros P, Mendes J, Mendes JM.2022Dent J (Basel)Link
Reflected near-infrared light versus bite-wing radiography for the detection of proximal caries: A multicenter prospective clinical study conducted in private practicesZvi Metzger, Dana G. Colson, Peggy Bown, Timo Weihard, Ingo Baresel, Tim Nolting2021Journal of DentistryLink
A comparison of near-infrared imaging with other diagnostic tools for dental caries.Valeria Vanella, Raffaella Castagnola, Luca Marigo, Nicola M. Grande, Gianluca Plotino2021Minerva Dental and Oral ScienceLink
Assessment of Fit on Ten Screw-Retained Frameworks Realized through Digital Full-Arch Implant ImpressionMaurizio De Francesco, Edoardo Stellini, Stefano Granata, Sergio Mazzoleni, Francesco Saverio Ludovichetti, Carlo Monaco and Adolfo Di Fiore2021Applied SciencesLink
Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machineMarta Revilla-León, Wael Att, Mutlu Özcan, Jeffrey Rubenstein2021Journal of Prosthetic DentistryLink
Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison.Christine Keul, Jan-Frederik Güth2020Clinical Oral InvestigationsLink
Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro studyFrancesco Guido Mangano, Oleg Admakin, Matteo Bonacina, Henriette Lerner, Vygandas Rutkunas and Carlo Mangano2020BMC Oral HealthLink
The effect different substrates have on the trueness and precision of eight different intraoral scanners.Ethan Dutton, Mark Ludlow, Anthony Mennito, Abigail Kelly, Zachary Evans, Alexander Culp, Raymond Kessler, Walter Renne2020Journal of Esthetic and Restorative DentistryLink
Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant positionRyan Jin-Young Kim, Goran I Benic, Ji-Man Park2019PLOS ONELink
Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners.Marta Revilla-León, Peng Jiang, Mehrad Sadeghpour, Wenceslao Piedra-Cascón, Amirali Zandinejad, Mutlu Özcan, Vinayak R Krishnamurthy2019Journal of Prosthetic DentistryLink
A new method to measure the accuracy of intraoral scanners along the complete dental arch: A pilot study.Mikel Iturrate, Erlantz Lizundia, Xabier Amezua, Eneko Solaberrieta2019Journal of Advanced ProsthodonticsLink
Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: Marginal and internal fit.Goran I. Benic, Irena Sailer, Marco Zeltner, Janine N. Gütermann, Mutlu Özcan and Sven Mühlemann2019Journal of Prosthetic DentistryLink